I don’t have anything to say. Great way to start a post. I am killing time. I may as well do a mini-update thing, spring clean my current life-cupboard. That makes less than no sense and is near to nonsense. That last sentence sounds like something out of Alice In Wonderland. Which I went to see a week ago. [edit: saw it a month ago - just never posted this]
Neat link I think 
I’ve just decided I will write the rest of this post in rhyme – for the hell of it and to give me a challenge. Starting…NOW. WOW. (see, already started)
3D is not for me
Alice has pep
and i like johnny depp
but one has to ask
does 3-D just mask
the film maker’s task?
Will the plot goes to rot
as the masses wear glasses
to detect an effect
seen off the screen
flying rock shock
fast paced past your face
a triffid more vivid
in the palace of Alice.
And Avatar?
make people blue, like that’s something new,
the rebirth of smurf
you’ve stepped on their turf.
No malice to Alice,
but 3-D for me,
is a fad that is bad.
Plus your cash takes a bash
the mind boggles with goggles
at the end you pretend
“wow! the glasses add masses,
what effects they project!”
Either that or fall flat
“I look like a twat”.
2-D, or not 2D?
3-D is the quest.
Goggles are best.
Beneath them conceal
a film that’s surreal,
a fire-stoker,
box-office stroker
a film.. mediocre?
For the record, I don’t have a vendetta against the 3-D thing (except the mark-up on the price and the hype). Avatar isn’t exactly my kind of film – a bit too sci-fi, a bit too ”let’s make a social/political point” - but I did think it looked good in 3-D lol. I thought it worked better three dimensionally than Alice in Wonderland, which is closer to the kind of film I do like. This is the thing, though. I think A in W is a decent film, but I won’t know until I can watch it on DVD; same goes for Avatar.
Posted by bluesilk 
